Benchmark report

Fastly thumbnail

Is fastly.com slow?

Homepage load times from 6 cities

Fast globally

Fastly responds quickly from all 6 test locations. Amsterdam was fastest at 12 ms; San Francisco took 72 ms.

Fastest
12 ms
Amsterdam
Slowest
72 ms
San Francisco
Successful requests
100%
6 locations

Response time around the world

Amsterdam 12ms typicalSan Francisco 72ms typicalMontreal 13ms typicalSingapore 15ms typicalTokyo 12ms typicalMumbai 12ms typical
  • NetherlandsAmsterdam
    12 ms
  • JapanTokyo
    12 ms
  • IndiaMumbai
    12 ms
  • CanadaMontreal
    13 ms
  • SingaporeSingapore
    15 ms
  • United StatesSan Francisco
    72 ms

Why is San Francisco slower?

Five cities finished in 13 to 19 ms in the controlled run of 4 October, with every phase in single digits: 2 to 5 ms to connect, 3 to 5 ms for TLS, 2 to 4 ms waiting and 2 to 5 ms downloading. San Francisco took 63 ms, and every phase grew together: 12 ms to connect, 15 ms for TLS, 13 ms waiting, 23 ms downloading. When all four stages stretch by a similar factor, the likely cause is a longer path to the edge that answered, not a slow server.

Click the location to see each stage.

ConnectTLSServer waitDownload
United StatesSan Francisco
63 ms
Finding the server
57 ms
Reaching the server
12 ms
Setting up security
15 ms
Waiting for the server
13 ms
Receiving the response: most of the time
23 ms
Total
63 ms

Finding the server is measured once per location, so it sits outside these bars. Open a city to see it.

Bars show the typical request, so the parts add up to its total. Why

Compare all locations

Click a city to see its stage-by-stage breakdown.

ConnectTLSServer waitDownload
NetherlandsAmsterdam
14 ms
Finding the server
26 ms
Reaching the server
3 ms
Setting up security: most of the time
5 ms
Waiting for the server
2 ms
Receiving the response
4 ms
Total
14 ms
United StatesSan Francisco
63 ms
Finding the server
57 ms
Reaching the server
12 ms
Setting up security
15 ms
Waiting for the server
13 ms
Receiving the response: most of the time
23 ms
Total
63 ms
CanadaMontreal
13 ms
Finding the server
4 ms
Reaching the server
2 ms
Setting up security: most of the time
4 ms
Waiting for the server
3 ms
Receiving the response
4 ms
Total
13 ms
SingaporeSingapore
19 ms
Finding the server
5 ms
Reaching the server: most of the time
5 ms
Setting up security
5 ms
Waiting for the server
4 ms
Receiving the response
5 ms
Total
19 ms
JapanTokyo
13 ms
Finding the server
5 ms
Reaching the server
3 ms
Setting up security
3 ms
Waiting for the server: most of the time
4 ms
Receiving the response
3 ms
Total
13 ms
IndiaMumbai
13 ms
Finding the server
4 ms
Reaching the server
3 ms
Setting up security: most of the time
4 ms
Waiting for the server
4 ms
Receiving the response
2 ms
Total
13 ms

The phases come from the controlled run of 4 October 2026. Typical and slower times pool the daily requests. 6 of 6 test locations included: Amsterdam, San Francisco, Montreal, Singapore, Tokyo, Mumbai.

Finding the server is measured once per location, so it sits outside these bars. Open a city to see it.

Bars show the typical request, so the parts add up to its total. Why

Fastly still feels slow?

Check Fastly’s status page
Edge incidents are posted per location there before they show up in a benchmark.
This is not a benchmark of your Fastly service
Your origin, VCL, cache rules and shielding decide what your visitors see. Compute, image optimisation and the control panel are not measured here.
Each city reaches its own edge
Six different addresses across our six cities in the controlled run, 50 ms apart at most. The edge San Francisco reaches answers noticeably more slowly than the others. A slow result from the US West Coast matches what we see; elsewhere it would be unusual.

Response time over the last 29 days

Daily median of 5 requests per location, 11 September 2026 to 10 October 2026.
05001000 ms11 Sept10 OctSan Francisco, 11 September 2026: 187 ms, well above its usual level.San Francisco, 12 September 2026: 195 ms, well above its usual level.San Francisco, 19 September 2026: 211 ms, well above its usual level.San Francisco, 29 September 2026: 575 ms, well above its usual level.San Francisco, 2 October 2026: 314 ms, well above its usual level.

A dot marks a day well above that location’s usual level.

Show the numbers
DayAmsterdamSan FranciscoMontrealSingaporeTokyoMumbai
11 September 202616 ms187 ms ▲15 ms20 ms16 ms11 ms
12 September 202612 ms195 ms ▲13 ms19 ms13 ms15 ms
13 September 202615 ms60 ms13 ms15 ms11 ms13 ms
14 September 202612 ms78 ms15 ms13 ms13 ms13 ms
15 September 202615 ms79 ms11 ms14 ms14 ms12 ms
16 September 202613 ms78 ms15 ms17 ms12 ms13 ms
17 September 202612 ms60 ms15 ms19 ms13 ms13 ms
18 September 202615 ms91 ms14 ms13 ms12 ms13 ms
19 September 202612 ms211 ms ▲13 ms14 ms13 ms14 ms
20 September 202614 ms74 ms13 ms20 ms13 ms12 ms
21 September 202612 ms82 ms14 ms17 ms13 ms13 ms
22 September 202612 ms60 ms11 ms14 ms12 ms12 ms
23 September 202611 ms69 ms12 ms13 ms13 ms12 ms
24 September 202612 ms61 ms10 ms14 ms12 ms13 ms
25 September 202612 ms54 ms12 ms14 ms12 ms11 ms
26 September 202611 ms61 ms11 ms14 ms11 ms12 ms
27 September 202613 ms55 ms11 ms14 ms12 ms12 ms
28 September 202613 ms76 ms13 ms16 ms11 ms17 ms
29 September 202611 ms575 ms ▲12 ms21 ms14 ms13 ms
30 September 202612 ms76 ms12 ms18 ms12 ms12 ms
1 October 202612 ms65 ms13 ms15 ms13 ms12 ms
2 October 202613 ms314 ms ▲15 ms17 ms12 ms12 ms
3 October 202611 ms81 ms13 ms15 ms12 ms11 ms
4 October 202612 ms68 ms14 ms22 ms12 ms12 ms
5 October 202610 ms73 ms15 ms15 ms11 ms12 ms
6 October 202612 ms66 ms14 ms14 ms11 ms12 ms
7 October 202612 ms69 ms12 ms15 ms12 ms12 ms
9 October 202611 ms81 ms12 ms13 ms14 ms13 ms
10 October 202612 ms61 ms12 ms15 ms13 ms12 ms

About this measurement

GET www.fastly.com · 65 requests per location over 13 daily runs · 27 September 2026 to 10 October 2026

What we tested · Marketing website. The www.fastly.com marketing homepage, about 665 KB of HTML served through Fastly's own cache.

How LatencyRadar measures response time →

Technical details

Doesn’t measure: The Fastly edge serving your service, Compute, or the control panel.

One Fastly surface: the www.fastly.com marketing homepage, about 665 KB of HTML served through Fastly's own cache. Fastly puts its own site on the CDN it sells, so the page shows how a cold request to that CDN is answered from each of our cities. It does not stand for your Fastly service: your origin, VCL, cache rules and shielding decide what your visitors see. From outside we cannot tell a cache miss from a longer path to the edge, and we do not know which point of presence answered beyond the address it used.

Between 27 September and 10 October 2026 Amsterdam, Montreal, Singapore, Tokyo and Mumbai all had a typical time of 12 to 15 ms, and San Francisco 72 ms. San Francisco's daily median was 55 to 81 ms on 11 of the 13 runs and 575 ms on 29 September and 314 ms on 2 October, never close to the rest: whatever edge our San Francisco worker reaches, it is not as close as the other cities' edges are to them. The other five cities' daily medians never left 10 to 22 ms. Their slower times split: 20 ms in Amsterdam and 33 ms in Singapore, but 612 ms in Tokyo, 703 ms in Montreal and 1,365 ms in Mumbai, from a handful of slow requests that never moved a daily median. The six different addresses across our cities in the controlled run fit an edge network. Netlify shows the same shape with Amsterdam as the outlier; Vercel is slower in five of the six cities, San Francisco being the exception.

Test locationTypical response timeSlower response timeRequests
Amsterdam12 ms20 ms65
San Francisco72 ms1673 ms65
Montreal13 ms703 ms65
Singapore15 ms33 ms65
Tokyo12 ms612 ms65
Mumbai12 ms1365 ms65

Typical: half of the requests finished within this time (technical: p50). Slower: 95% of requests finished within this time (technical: p95). Statistics

Request
GET www.fastly.com
Measured from
Amsterdam · San Francisco · Montreal · Singapore · Tokyo · Mumbai
Requests
Daily measurements from 27 September 2026 to 10 October 2026. 6 of 6 test locations included: Amsterdam, San Francisco, Montreal, Singapore, Tokyo, Mumbai. · 27 September 2026 to 10 October 2026
Timings taken
DNS, connect, TLS, waiting for the server, download
Report coverage
6 of 6 test locations included: Amsterdam, San Francisco, Montreal, Singapore, Tokyo, Mumbai.
Coverage changes
Mumbai (measured since 7 September 2026) joined this report on 21 September 2026. Earlier daily bands keep their previous location set.
Daily requests in each location
Amsterdam: 65 · San Francisco: 65 · Montreal: 65 · Singapore: 65 · Tokyo: 65 · Mumbai: 65
Typical response time
Median of the eligible daily requests in each included location.
Slower response time
The 95th percentile of the same eligible daily requests in each included location.

Fastly

https://www.fastly.com/

Independent measurement by LatencyRadar. Not affiliated with Fastly. · How we measure (v1.3)

How fast does your site load around the world?

Run a free speed test from multiple cities and find out where your users are waiting. No setup, no account required.

Test my site

No account required · Takes about 30 seconds.

More benchmarks

All benchmarks →